Developing technology to help… not hurt
0For the majority of my formative years, I have been obsessed with automation. Seeing a robot perform a human (or superhuman for that matter) motion gives me goose-bumps. I’ve been known to laugh and clap my hands like a little boy while watching “How its Made” on the Discovery channel…
I love technology, and the freedom it has granted mankind from the mundane. File cabinets? Card catalogs? Long Division? Replaced with databases, kiosks and calculators. For the most part, the changes have been liberating.
No longer are we forced to categorize information by a single trait — databases allow us to organize our files however we choose, and form elaborate relationships among the various sources of information. That is, customers need not be sorted from A to Z only; now we can sort them by location, age, occupation, or shoe size (if we have such information…). The data itself has been set free.
Libraries – the great repositories of information – were once bound by the same. Books can only be sorted in one fashion, and finding a book based on subject matter or publication date was tedious at best. Maintaining this alternate index required constant maintenance, and hundreds of tiny drawers.
Automation comes at a cost, unfortunately. One auto assembly line robot can perform the work of several humans with super-human speed and accuracy; and they don’t go on strike.
Technology should be helping mankind. It should allow us to use our resources more effectively, and focus our energies on making the world a better place. When a dangerous job is performed by a robot instead of a man, that man does not get to move on to better jobs – he is unemployed.
There can be no doubt that technology has improved life for all people to some extent, but not nearly as much as it could.
In church last week, I heard about a nursing home in the Eau Claire area that is run down to the point of being dangerous. During the pastor’s visit, there was a single attendant for all the residents. The floors were dirty, with trash all over the place. People were standing in the hallway with every manner of assistive medical device precariously hanging off them. The woman the pastor was visiting was on a ventilator that became plugged while he was there.
What is the problem? Why is there only one attendant? Why can’t they keep the place clean?
Money. They cannot afford to hire enough people, and they cannot afford to pay the people what they deserve.
This is where automation technologies are needed; not in a toll-booth plaza.
There is, of course, a catch-22.
Say we develop a computerized system that makes it possible for a single person to manage a nursing home. Who will benefit from this system? If we can make it affordable, the run-down nursing home might become livable again. But, the swanky corporation-owned “assisted living” facility will also benefit — and lay of the majority of their staff. The reality is that these technologies are never affordable – only those that do not need them can afford them.
If we find a way to fill in the gap where another person genuinely cannot be afforded, companies that CAN afford it will seek to increase profits and fire everybody.
How then do we do it? How do we replace people without displacing them?
Napster to go… for now…
0I am currently a Napster-to-go subscriber. This service allows me to pay $15/month and download / transfer as much music as I want to a compatible player.
Yes, it is a rip off if I don’t continually expand my collection, because if I cancel my account, all the money I have given them becomes several hundred megabytes of useless DRM-locked bits.
That stinks, but the service is convenient, and I really had no complaints… until today.
I had a very nice collection on my old computer that I recently decided to use again – which required updating the licenses. What do you know, song after song were unplayable. The artist, or record company had decided to no longer allow the songs to be heard in their entirety without purchase. I’m only allowed to listen to the first 30-seconds of the songs.
In other words, my music collection is only safe as long as the artist and record company says so? This is ridiculuous.
What the industry doesn’t seem to understand is that the harder yoou make it to legally obtain music, and the more restrictions you place on it, the more people will seek out illegal means.
The album Once, by Nightwish is a good example. I have no desire to buy the album – most of the songs are no good. Neither am I going to pay $1.00 for a song I have essentially already paid for (and them some…). It is completely unreasonable to expect me to pay twice for something. So I wil find another way to get my songs back.
Most of my library was either from CDs or Napster. Unfortunately, more and more songs are getting the green 30-second circle, and I have to seek alternative means. I wish I didn’t have to, but I will probably cancel my membership – it has become a waste of money. Hopefully the industry will eventually get the hint – make music cheaper and easier to get, and people will be happy to pay for it.
New Post Link
0I thought it was an annoying nucleus feature, but I guess I was wrong. Apparently, most blog software packages think the authors should have to hunt down the admin link, then hunt down the new-post link in order to make a new post.
Is this really what people want? WHY!!
I do not understand why they would not put a new post link in an easy to find location when you are logged in, and I do not understand why I should have to customize the code just to get such a link.
Blarg.
Moving right along
0I have moved to a new host.
Total Choice Hosting has been my host since 2002 I think – it’s been a long time. But alas, I was won over by the wares of another — dreamhost.
I pay a little bit more, but I get tons more – and without the unpleasant aftertaste. Most importantly, I get shell access to my account, and I can host multiple domains.
I have three of them right now, I have to decide what to do with them. I was considering moving the blog type posting craziness to another domain, as shulerent was supposed to be a semi-serious starting point for my devious plans of world domination. It turned into a blog, and I don’t like blogs – I once despised the term ‘blog’.
But the world turns, seasons change, the inevitable inevitably occurs and… I have to accept the the phrase.
While having a discussion with my Mother, I learned that she was unaware of the vast history this blog contains – going all the way back to the beginning. Nucleus’ historical posts can only be viewed by month – so looking to the past can be a real pain.
I am in the process of converting to WordPress. It’s much nicer, and MUCH better supported. You can sample the system at http://www.deviatone.com.
Now I must watch Extreme Makeover: Home Edition and cry like a sissy girl.
Molly Loves Roomba
0Dispite her apparent distaste for the thing while it is cleaning, she seems to have taken a liking to it:
And for old times sake, here is my little man and Mollybear. This is the last picture I have of him before he died.
The future…
0Intellectual Property Enhanced Criminal Enforcement Act of 2007
“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face — forever.”
— George Orwell, 1984
Copyright violation on a … Commercial???
0http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-CnchIjtaY
This should be a link to a funny sonic commercial. A commercial that Sonic has to pay TV stations more money than I’ll ever see at once to play several times per day. They are really good commercials, and I like watching them.
But it is not a commercial. Apparently allowing people to download an advertisement of their own free will is a violation of copyright. That’s right, we only get to watch commercials when we are forced to – how dare we WANT to watch a advertisement.
Their website has no contact page.
While it seems like a kind of meaningless thing, I find it absolutely frustrating. When commercials go out of circulation they dissappear entirely. You cannot pay to have access to the commercial (nor should you have to). A worthwhile piece of art is going to be lost just because some sue-crazy executive at Americas Drive In Corp. thinks they need to protect their copyright.
Copyrights are supposed to protect the ability of an artist to make money of a creative work. Not snub out the free exchange of information.
Saving Grace
0TNT has been pusing their new series “Saving Grace” real hard for the last month or so. They have thrown ad clips in between other shows (Law & Order, for example), and had those annoying lower-right-corner ads during other shows.
They made it sound like another crime drama involving a female investigator, with the twist that she is visited by God, or an angel or something.
So I was not interested, but since there was nothing else on, I watched it last week.
The show is on at 9:00pm – not exactly late – and it is rated TV-MA. The VERY FIRST SCENE is a bad-porn-esque sex scene that is far too revealing for a major network at 9:00pm… especially in a show that has been advertised as a respectable crime drama, during other respectable crime dramas and with a religious overtone.
They spent way too much time demonstrating how disgusting her life is (I believe that was the point), and very little showing us why we should care.
She is only an exceptional investigator insomuch as everybody else she works with are incompetent.
I was generally appalled by lack of thought TNT put into this show. Without the TV-MA rating, and completely unnecessary sex / language, (and a decent plot and believable characters…) this show could be watchable. As it is, I hope TNT gets in some kind of trouble.
So anyway, 9:00pm on Monday rolls around as it often does, and there is nothing on. I decide to give “Saving Grace” another chance…
Within the first 3 minutes she gets tobacco-spit from an angel in a tree who misses the spit bottle (I’m guessing the writers thought this would be funny?), then starts rolling around on the ground with her man-friend, her intentions obvious.
Since they presume to make a self-sustaining show out of the process of “saving” Grace, she is going to have to keep doing things requiring saving – which means that the show will continue to be a complete waste of time.
BTAudio executable downloads
0As I discovered recently, these files are not available outside of the dang zip file. Here they are, ready to be dowloaded right to your smartphone / PDA.
These utilities allow you to use a regular Bluetooth headset to listen to mp3, movies, audio, etc. They redirect all sound to the Bluetooth headset. Run BTAudioOn to enable, BTAudioOff to disable. These are stateless applications – they have no way of knowing the current setting, but it doesn’t hurt to run them twice.
BTAudioOn.exe
BTAudioOff.exe
BTAudioToggle.exe
All relevant credit goes here:
http://pdaphonehome.com/forums/samsung-i730-i830-i830w/54951-utility-redirect-all-audio-bluetooth-headset.html
They just didn’t have the guts to post the binaries for those without a PC to sync.
Harry Potter and the Really Good Book
0Just finished reading the last Harry Potter book. It’s good. Real good. Some of things JK Rowling said had me worried… Luckily my fears were unfounded.
I read for a few hours last night, then started this morning at around 11:30am (right after I woke up), and finished around 5:15am. Stopping only for necessaries.
All I can say is that it was a very satisfying read.
I will say no more, for my mother has not yet read the book, and she reads my page.
